Here is the first rough draft of the Embed paper. It is basically a direct copy and paste from the larger paper, we added a small introductory section, and formatted it into two columns (the figures and some of the formulas run into other columns, we need to find a solution). Greg and I have come up with a few questions about where to go with this.
We mention that this paper builds from the other paper we are going to submit. The other paper contains a lot of basic terminology, but neither paper contains the information about heads. Are we just going to remove all mention of heads? It seems like this would leave holes in our logic at times.
Should most of the background information be stated in an introduction, or is mentioning the other paper enough? How much of the background information is "common knowledge" among the audience of this paper?
Posted by kernco at September 8, 2004 09:52 PM